|
1
|
- Caroline E. Fife, MD
- Associate Professor
- Department of Anesthesiology
- University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Memorial Hermann Center for Wound
Healing
|
|
2
|
- In 2006 there were 322,946 reported cases of Medicare patients with a
pressure ulcer as a secondary diagnosis.
- It is estimated 2.5 million patients are treated each year in U.S. acute
care facilities for pressure ulcers.
|
|
3
|
- Healthy People 2010 Goal significantly reduce pressure ulcer incidence
during this decade.
- BUT WE ALREADY KNOW IT IS GOING TO FAIL
- This seems like a simple problem, why can’t we fix it?
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
- Intact skin with non-blanchable redness of a localized area usually over
a bony prominence. Darkly pigmented skin may not have visible blanching;
its color may differ from the surrounding area.
- The area may be painful, firm, soft, warmer or cooler as compared to
adjacent tissue.
- Stage I may be difficult to detect in individuals with dark skin tones.
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
- “Deep tissue injury may be difficult to detect in individuals with dark
skin tones.” (NPUAP)
- “The skin should be assessed for alterations in pain or feeling (note
that this requires a responsive patient).
- “. . . a change of skin color should be noted by knowing the range of
skin pigmentation that is normal for your particular patient.”
- “The correct lighting source is important to accurately perform this
assessment. Use natural or halogen light.”
- “Florescent light should be avoided as it casts a bluish hue to the
skin.”
|
|
8
|
- Stage I pressure ulcers are not “ulcers” in the strict definition of the
term since there is no break in the epithelium
- The ability to identify Stage I pressure ulcers is reduced among
patients with pigmented skin.
- “A reliable system to accurately identify Stage I pressure ulcers in
individuals with darkly pigmented skin should be developed.”
- It is not known with what accuracy and reliability Stage I pressure
ulcers can be reliably assessed in patients of any ethnicity.
|
|
9
|
- These skin changes are defined as “pressure ulcers” even though they
are not “ulcers” in the correct sense of the word.
- Data confirm that patient skin color, and the need for an interactive
effort (blanching) which is subjective and requires training and skill,
makes it almost impossible to reliably diagnose them.
- To date there is no evidence that stage I pressure “ulcers” develop
into other pressure ulcers.
|
|
10
|
- “Bruise like” areas which may actually represent deep tissue injury may
be mistaken for Stage I pressure ulcers.
- It seems likely that only highly trained individuals will be able to
detect Stage I pressure sores at all, or distinguish them from DTI,
particularly in darkly pigmented individuals.
- Furthermore, the NPUAP has provided guidance for the MDS forms to mark
“stage I” for skin changes likely to represent deep tissue injury since
no other classification exists.
|
|
11
|
- Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with
a red pink wound bed, without slough.
- May also present as an intact or open/ruptured serum-filled blister.
* This stage should not be used to describe skin tears, tape
burns, perineal dermatitis, maceration or excoriation.
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Not supposed to be used to classify skin tears and other superficial
injuries.
- However, this is common practice in skin assessments.
- Furthermore, in some high risk areas of the body, it may be difficult to
differentiate injury due to friction and sheer or pressure from other
types if injury.
- At this time, most hospitals have no alternative system for documenting
the presence or severity of these wounds.
- Likely they will continue to be documented as “Stage II ulcers.”
|
|
14
|
- Discoloration of a heel in a child after a cast is removed.
- Not really a blister (yet).
- Not a Stage I because it is not “non blanching erythema.”
- Might be called a II if it turns into a blister since the NPUAP
classified blisters as Stage II.
|
|
15
|
- NPUAP classifies this closed heel blister as a Stage II.
- However, as long as the blister is in tact, the full extent of tissue
injury in this case cannot be known.
- This is a serious problem with classifying closed blisters as Stage II.
|
|
16
|
- Moisture
- Friction
- Sheer
- Incontinence
|
|
17
|
- Full thickness tissue loss. Subcutaneous fat may be visible but bone,
tendon or muscle are not exposed.
- May include undermining and tunneling.
The depth of a stage III pressure ulcer varies by anatomical
location. The bridge of the nose, ear, occiput and malleolus do not have
subcutaneous tissue and stage III ulcers can be shallow. In contrast,
areas of significant adiposity can develop extremely deep stage III
pressure ulcers. Bone/tendon is not visible or directly palpable.
|
|
18
|
- Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle.
- Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed.
- Often include undermining and tunneling.
- Can extend into muscle and/or supporting structures (e.g., fascia,
tendon or joint capsule) making osteomyelitis possible.
- Exposed bone/tendon is visible or directly palpable.
|
|
19
|
- The old definition of Stage III was an ulcer which did not extend
through the fascia, but not all areas have fascia.
- Anatomical location determines how much soft tissue is present over the
bone.
- The definition of a Stage III is full thickness tissue loss but no
“directly palpable” bone. The bone is palpable at the elbow here. Is it
a III or a IV?
- Similar areas are the head and nose.
|
|
20
|
- Immobility
- Decreased level of consciousness
- Decreased sensation
- Poor nutrition
- Acute severe illness
|
|
21
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
- Tissue near bone experiences the most pressure which dissipates and
spreads as superficial layers are approached.
- Confirmed by seated MRI images of paraplegics.
- While superficial layers experience the least amount of pressure, they
have the largest AREA affected (an upside down triangle).
|
|
24
|
- Despite low skin surface pressures, deep tissues have higher pressures
which causes the formation of a cavity below the dermis.
- The epidermis does not show signs of necrosis until LATE.
|
|
25
|
- Figure 3 shows the sacrum of a patient on admission demonstrating
subcutaneous tissue damage when skin changes were not apparent.
- Figure 4 shows improvement over time.
- Suggests early intervention might halt progression to the skin, but that
once damage has become apparent at the level of the skin, irreversible
deep tissue damage has already occurred.
|
|
26
|
- Full thickness tissue loss in which the base of the ulcer is covered by
slough (yellow, tan, gray, green or brown) and/or eschar (tan, brown or
black) in the wound bed.
- Until enough slough and/or eschar is removed to expose the base of the
wound, the true depth, and therefore stage, cannot be determined.
|
|
27
|
- The NPUAP definition of a Stage II ulcer says that it is without slough.
- Therefore, any wound which DOES have slough or necrotic material by
definition MUST be a stage III or stage IV.
- The only reason an ulcer would be called “unstageable” is because one
cannot determine whether muscle or bone is involved, but the presence of
eschar or slough means that it MUST be a stage III or IV.
- However, the new present on admission policy does not assign the MC-CM
code to “unstagable” ulcers, even though they MUST be either stage III
or IV!
- Furthermore, we simply cannot have a “staging system” in which one of
the official stages is “unknown.”
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
- “This assessment system only describes the anatomic status of the ulcer
at the time of assessment.” (NPUAP)
- It is based on the anatomic depth of soft tissue damage.
- There is no implication in the staging system that the stages progress
through the numbers.
- However, THIS MEANS THAT THE SYSTEM DOES NOT MEET THE DEFINITION OF A
“STAGING” SYSTEM.
|
|
30
|
- In cancer, stages PROGRESS from one stage to another.
- Example: carcinoma in situ, invasive cancer, metastatic cancer
- Staging can be used to PREDICT OUTCOME
- Staging can be used to DIRECT TREATMENT
|
|
31
|
- Are there any data to support the idea that pressure ulcers “Progress”
from one stage to another?
- Tissue (biopsy) data from pressure ulcers is VERY limited (this needs to
be corrected). However, to date, the evidence is overwhelming that stage
III/IV pressure ulcers form from the inside out and do not progress from
stage II ulcers.
- The reason they might be perceived to have progressed from “stage I”
ulcers is that deep tissue injuries were MISCLASSIFIED as stage I
ulcers.
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or
blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue from
pressure and/or shear. The area may be preceded by tissue that is
painful, firm, mushy, boggy, warmer or cooler as compared to adjacent
tissue.
|
|
37
|
- Purple non-blanchable area of intact skin
- Demarcation in 24-48 hours
- Deep underlying tissue destruction
- Damage has occurred at bone-tissue interface
|
|
38
|
- Since Stage III and IV ulcers are forming from the inside out, what do
they look like as they form?
- It seems likely that Stage III and IV pressure ulcers are examples of
deep tissue injury after their evolution has completed.
|
|
39
|
- A growing body of evidence suggests that all stage III and IV pressure
ulcers are the result of deep tissue injury.
|
|
40
|
- In cancer staging, the stage of the cancer either predicts outcome or
directs treatment.
- Stage III and IV pressure ulcers have a statistically equal likelihood
of requiring surgical intervention and are thus not different from each
other.
- Stage II pressure ulcers have a high likelihood of healing.
- Stage I pressure ulcers may resolve or result in deep ulcerations.
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
- Stage III and IV often will heal with deep tracts.
- 39.9% healing stage III in nursing home, 45.2% in hospital
- 34.1% healing for stage IV in nursing home, 30.6% in hospital
- There is no statistical difference in the surgical closure rate between
Stage III and Stage IV ulcers.
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
- The Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) includes directions to describe
the healing ulcer.
- “Although CMS understands that pressure ulcers do not heal from a Stage
IV to a Stage III (eg, reverse staging) until the Minimum Data Set (MDS)
is changed, reverse staging ulcer should continue.”
|
|
46
|
- It is not logical that reimbursement agencies require health care
practitioners to periodically "restage" pressure ulcers to
show improvement. It is incorrect to indicate that pressure ulcers heal
by moving from Stage IV to Stage I.
- Reverse staging should never be used to describe the healing of a
pressure ulcer.
- Pressure ulcer staging systems should only be used to document the
maximum anatomic depth of tissue involved in the ulcer after necrotic
tissue has been removed.
- Healing of pressure ulcers should be documented by objective parameters
such as: size, depth, amount of necrotic tissue, amount of exudate,
presence of granulation tissue, etc.
- Health Care Financing Administration should work with NPUAP and other
interested health care organizations to rectify procedures, policies
and reimbursement criteria that encourage or require reverse staging as
a means to assess pressure ulcer healing.
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
- CMS requires these to be classified as Stage I.
|
|
49
|
- “The treatment of pressure ulcers is predicated on the fact that
clinical staff can properly assess ulcer characteristics.”
- (1) differentiate the type of ulcer (pressure versus
non-pressure-related ulcer . . .
- . . . The LTCF should have staff members who are proficient in their
ability to delineate between a pressure ulcer and the more common
chronic ulcers . . .arterial
insufficiency ulcers.
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
- “The LTCF should have staff members who are proficient in their ability
to delineate between a pressure ulcer and. . .arterial insufficiency
ulcers.”
|
|
52
|
- The NPUAP staging system refers only to the depth of tissue apparent
base of the wound at the time it is assessed.
- The numeric nature of the staging system does not imply that ulcers
“progress” through the stages.
- Stage I pressure ulcers are extremely difficult correctly identify
regardless of skin type and may be mistaken for deep tissue injury.
- Stage II pressure ulcers are more likely related to friction and sheer
and are often confused with skin tears, tape burns and other types of
trauma.
- There is no evidence that Stage III and IV pressure ulcers are preceded
by earlier stage pressure ulcers.
- Stage III and IV pressure ulcers seem to form from a similar
pathological process (deep tissue necrosis) and may be hard to
distinguish from each other depending on the anatomical location.
|
|
53
|
- Deep tissue injury may be the early presentation of Stage III and IV
pressure ulcers.
- Unstageable pressure ulcers will be staged as Stage III or IV after
debridement.
- Arterial ulcerations are often confused with pressure ulcerations and
pressure can be the inciting event for arterial ulcers.
|
|
54
|
- The current NPUAP staging system does not meet the critera for a staging
system since stage I and DTI can be confused with each other, stage III
and IV are likely the same thing (with the same outcome, ie, surgery)
and stage II ulcers do not become deeper ulcers.
|
|
55
|
- As long as IN TACT skin is classified as an ULCER in any way, there will
continue to be confusion.
- Any system which uses letters or numbers will imply PROGRESSION.
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
- The real challenge will be finding a way to describe pressure ulcers as
they are forming, BEFORE the skin breaks down.
- In tact skin changes should not be called ulcers. What will we call
them?
|