KOA Boulevard

Time Sensitive! It’s Not Too Late to Sign the Letter to CMS Protesting the 41.5% Reduction of HBOT Facility Fees!

The response to the proposed 41.5% cut in the hospital facility fees for HBOT in 2024 has been impressive. Many large hospital systems have told CMS that they will close their hyperbaric operations if the proposed cut is implemented. Rapid response by the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society (UHMS), the Alliance of Wound Care Stakeholders, and many others have determined that Medicare’s cost analysis has to be in error (even when you consider the bad cost data provided by hospitals to CMS – it still looks like a “mistake”). However, the fact that CMS made a mistake (assuming that CMS agrees that it’s a mistake) does not mean that it will be fixed at all or fixed before January 1st. If they do fix it, corrective payments could be made retroactively.

The first letter of concern to CMS had more than 1,600 signatures – many from large hospital systems. However, so many individuals and institutions still wanted to lodge an official complaint that we’ve prepared a second letter. HERE’S YOUR CHANCE TO PROTEST THE DECREASE IN HBOT FACILITY FEES IF YOU DID NOT GET THE CHANCE BEFORE. Time is running out. Use the link below in the message from UHMS Executive Director, John Peters.

I know the holidays are busy – but most of us would like to have a job to go back to in January…

And THANK YOU to everyone who has been working on this at every level.

–Caroline

Caroline Fife, MD

Dr. Fife is Co-Founder and Chief Medical Officer of Intellicure, Executive Director of the US Wound Registry, and Editor of Today’s Wound Clinic.

Subscribe to the Intellicure Blog!

Submit the form below to receive email alerts when Intellicure publishes a new blog post! This information will not be shared.

Follow Intellicure

You May Also Like …

Wound Care Quality Outcome Metrics: What They Are and Why They Matter for Your Practice

Wound Care Quality Outcome Metrics: What They Are and Why They Matter for Your Practice

Wound care quality outcome metrics have become the primary language through which practices prove their clinical value to payers, CMS, and accreditation bodies under value-based reimbursement. This article breaks down which metrics matter most, how they tie into MIPS and QCDR reporting requirements, and how purpose-built wound care technology makes measurement actionable rather than a burden.

Wound Care Billing and Coding Best Practices: A Step-by-Step Guide for Clinicians

Wound Care Billing and Coding Best Practices: A Step-by-Step Guide for Clinicians

This step-by-step guide to wound care billing and coding best practices walks wound care physicians, clinic administrators, and billing teams through documentation structure, CPT code selection, modifier rules, ICD-10 pairing, claim scrubbing, and denial management. Whether you operate a hospital-based wound center or an independent clinic, these principles provide a clear, repeatable process for maximizing first-pass claim acceptance and improving revenue cycle performance.

7 Key Strategies for Choosing Between Smart Dressings and Traditional Wound Dressings

7 Key Strategies for Choosing Between Smart Dressings and Traditional Wound Dressings

This article equips wound care clinicians with 7 data-driven strategies for choosing between smart dressings vs traditional wound dressings, covering wound complexity, practice infrastructure, reimbursement, and documentation requirements. Rather than treating the decision as binary, it provides a nuanced, patient-centered framework that helps practitioners deploy each dressing category effectively to optimize healing outcomes and compliance.