KOA Boulevard

States Try to Limit the Use of AI in Prior Authorization

AI Prior Authorization

Stateline reports health insurance companies are facing “scrutiny for allegedly using artificial intelligence bots and algorithms to swiftly deny patients routine or lifesaving care” without a human reviewing the claims. Lawmakers in in more than a dozen states are considering legislation to limit the use of AI in reviewing claims; exclude certain prescription medications from prior authorization rules; ensure that emergency mental health care is not delayed for more than 48 hours; and require that insurers’ review boards include licensed physicians, dentists or pharmacists with clinical experience. Insurers say that prior authorization is needed to limit unnecessary services while doctors say that it causes delays in necessary care and harms patients. Health insurance companies are under increasing scrutiny for allegedly using artificial intelligence bots and algorithms to swiftly deny patients routine or lifesaving care — without a human actually reviewing their claims.

There had been protests and outrage over UnitedHeathcare’s prior authorization practices months before the high-profile murder of CEO Brian Thompson. However, his killing has focused even more attention on the prior authorization process. UnitedHealthcare has been accused in a class-action lawsuit of using AI to wrongfully deny claims. Read the complete article for more details on what individual states are doing to push back.

 Related posts

 

Caroline Fife, MD

Dr. Fife is Co-Founder and Chief Medical Officer of Intellicure, Executive Director of the US Wound Registry, and Editor of Today’s Wound Clinic.

Subscribe to the Intellicure Blog!

Submit the form below to receive email alerts when Intellicure publishes a new blog post! This information will not be shared.

Follow Intellicure

You May Also Like …

Wound Care Quality Outcome Metrics: What They Are and Why They Matter for Your Practice

Wound Care Quality Outcome Metrics: What They Are and Why They Matter for Your Practice

Wound care quality outcome metrics have become the primary language through which practices prove their clinical value to payers, CMS, and accreditation bodies under value-based reimbursement. This article breaks down which metrics matter most, how they tie into MIPS and QCDR reporting requirements, and how purpose-built wound care technology makes measurement actionable rather than a burden.

Wound Care Billing and Coding Best Practices: A Step-by-Step Guide for Clinicians

Wound Care Billing and Coding Best Practices: A Step-by-Step Guide for Clinicians

This step-by-step guide to wound care billing and coding best practices walks wound care physicians, clinic administrators, and billing teams through documentation structure, CPT code selection, modifier rules, ICD-10 pairing, claim scrubbing, and denial management. Whether you operate a hospital-based wound center or an independent clinic, these principles provide a clear, repeatable process for maximizing first-pass claim acceptance and improving revenue cycle performance.